Logo

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

Last Updated: 18.06.2025 12:36

Why do some people prefer watching movies than reading novels even if they are both based on the same source material (book)?

But take one of his plays and make me a movie and I'd love to watch. I loved “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”as a movie more than the play all because of the writing style. I am used to reading proper prose in novels. Not the script of plays. So the movie worked better for me.

The books, however, were insufferable. They were filled with “holy shit” and other moronic mind voices of the protagonist Anna. They effectively drowned out the story and I quit midway of 50 shades darker

Even if one has the skill, many people lack the ability to imagine and visualize the scenes portrayed in words, which dampens their novel experience. It's just a bunch of words to them.

Why do people say "tall, dark, and handsome" when they actually mean "tall, white, and handsome"?

Because reading is WORK. Period.

So a novel may be less enjoyable for them.

The Grey series was steamy but I was still able to focus on the actual story in the movies.

What’s a historical event you wish more people talked about?

If you have to work too hard to get entertained, it may not appeal to you. And for some people, reading is too hard a work and watching a movie is simply easier.

PC: Google

PC: Google

What timeless pieces do you believe every wardrobe should possess?

I don't have the patience to read Shakespeare and visualize the story because of the old lyrical English therein. Not much for poetic/dramatic words.

Very hard to do the above very enjoyable couple/group/friends activity with books.

I gave up and enjoyed the movies, read the discussions on the original text and enjoyed it immensely.

Do you think this Labour Party is qualified to run our country?

Let's be frank. What is in fiction for us unless we are forced to study it at school?

Bella in the movies remained the eff shut up, so I could just use both my own imagination and enjoy the director’s vision.

Her orgasmic thoughts were thankfully absent in the movie so the movie was way better. Still bad enough that I just watched the first and passed the rest.

When a dog smells another dog’s poo or wee, do they then remember that scent for when they smell it again, or even further know which dog they are smelling if they know the dog?

Entertainment.

How many of you found the Twilight franchise and 50 shades of Grey trilogy at least somewhat entertaining as movies? I did!

Granted that the examples I might be citing here are as such not great works, but bear with me.

My boyfriend won’t tell me his past and it hurts me so I broke up with him what do I do?

So what you see on screen is fun, visually entertaining, well put-together as opposed to a novel that may have been tiring, boring and not well placed.

Some translated books are just not good. Ponniyin Selvan is an example.

Sometimes, maybe you aren't good at English so you find it hard to read an English book, say, Game of Thrones, in its original format. So you buy a translated version in your mother tongue, say Tamil or Hindi (hypothetically).

The odd effects a year in space has on the bodies of astronauts - supercarblondie.com

Actually have some literary skill:

Netflix and chill is a thing:

PC: The Guardian

Why does a narcissist act like it's nothing when they hurt you?

You'll not work to get something you can get by just paying for a Netflix subscription.

There are some books that just…suck!

Many if not most, are in this category.

What defines the k'vanna of the Book of בראשית?

Have the ability to visualize:

Twilight at least was somewhat decently written. The Grey series was not even good writing.

Or the movie script may have taken the source material and derived its own form of storytelling, which may prove to be more interesting than the novel’s storytelling style.

I read this: "Putin is a brilliant, courageous, ingenious, determined, beloved, and incredible modern leader. He is currently the world’s most effective and strong leader, the best the world has seen in centuries." What do you think about this?

A story is just a sequence of events but storytelling involves a lot more. With words alone, it's already a handicap, but even there, not all authors are created the same.

PC: Google (Romeo and Juliet)

Sometimes the production team of the movie is just better than the author of the novel, correspondingly:

In your opinion, who is the most overrated singer/band/artist in modern music history and why?

PC: Google…my precious!

Many people do not have a comprehensive vocabulary in any language required to sail through a literary work in it, leave alone the one which their material of interest is printed in. Not all of us will patiently read with a dictionary by our sides.

This is often a mindset. It can be acquired and often comes naturally to those who have a reading habit as such, but there are a number of people who do try and are unable to carry this conversion out effectively - maybe something to do with the creative/imaginative centres of the brain.

NASCAR hopeful for deserved return to Mexico City in 2026; will INDYCAR join? - FOX Sports

Twilight was a fun watch - I suspended my brain and enjoyed the imaginary world.

Unless you have a reading habit as such, you cannot read fast and comprehensively enough to not just process the words and sentences, but also to feel the phrase, sentence, paragraph, page or chapter as a whole.

PC: Google

Microsoft Starts Deleting Your Passwords In 6 Weeks—Act Now - Forbes

The novels? I picked up Eclipse, and a few sentences showing the various ruminations of Bella were enough to make me hate her already. I didn't attempt to read.

There is an actual condition - aphantasia- wherein you lack the ability to imagine/visualise.

PC: Google

The doctor said 'be happy.' Music therapy can help cancer patients do that - NPR

Many people just survive school and college just preparing their study material and do not have enough aptitude in any language to be able to read and comprehensively understand long texts.

In the end, if nothing else, a movie is just a touch and earphones away. A book requires concentration. The lazier option is always more appealing.

Turns out, the translation is not the slang you speak in real life but is a formal proper language and you suck at that as well.

How will the 2026 delimitation affect India as a whole keeping the new count of 888 seats in mind (not the current 543)? I’m looking for genuine answers with facts and not rhetoric. I will only listen to answers and not reply to any of them.

There is also the issue of translation and language barrier.

Imagery, sequence, suspense, emotions. Some authors may not be able to bring the story out the way a movie director could.

Outdated language but easily understandable presentation in cinema:

But no one will have any problem in watching a dubbed version of GoT and all the titillating scenes in it are further incentive to brave through it effortlessly. No skill required.

I didn't like the English translated version at all and I am not that good at literary Tamil to read the original.

A movie may have taken some creative license and given us a more feel good ending that is more appealing to audiences than the original book storyline.

Reading a novel, especially a fictional novel with immense imagery, and enjoying it on par with or more than you'd enjoy a movie requires you to: